|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
*********************************************************************** If you have a chlorpyrifos well water contamination, don't drink your water ... don't use your water.
USE the super-chlorination process which Dow recommends if your water source has been contaminated with chlorpyrifos.
Despite what Dow may tell you, using their procedure creates a far more serious health
threat to you and your family by converting chlorpyrifos to an even more toxic
compound. And this procedure is not approved by the EPA as Dow has claimed.
What You Should Know: Individuals who have experienced Well/Drinking Water Contaminations should know that Dow has intentionally deceived you. The decontamination procedure they recommend and use for chlorpyrifos contaminations is a complete deception. Here is what Dow has known about this procedure since at least the early 1980's:
Details If Dow personnel break the law hiding reports of health complaints do you think they'd bother reporting well contaminations? By hiding all water incidents Dow has also kept their entire well decontamination process from scrutinization. You will see that the well procedure is in itself a superb example of the irresponsible and criminal deceptions the people at Dow use. This Dow business practice has now been termed "Poisoning For Profits". Some individuals have indicated that Dow has reported less than 2% of all chlorpyrifos water contaminations in the U.S. These are contaminations that Dow has dealt with or had knowledge of occurring. This means that tens of thousands of people have been involved in well contaminations but their well contamination has gone unreported. That insight was brought forth during the process of reconciling what Dow reported in chlorpyrifos well-water contaminations as compared to their known occurrence. This under-reporting would be in line and of the same type compliance problem Dow had with failing to report the chlorpyrifos health complaints that turned into lawsuits discussed in previous sections. It is now also understood that the only incidents Dow's field reps have been instructed to formally report are those that they personally determine could possibly become lawsuits. That of course is not what the law requires - ALL health complaints and well contaminations involving pesticides are required by federal law to be reported. The EPA's discovery of Dow not reporting them should have been a major hint to the EPA that Dow has been hiding something even more sinister. We have been able to determined at least one procedure which Dow did openly put in place concerning drinking water samples and the analysis of those water samples that would destroy evidence of the incident. Dow provides water sample analysis for anyone at no charge but Dow requires that no water samples are allowed to be sent to the Dow lab until the well has undergone at least 24 hours of their chlorination procedure. In other words, they refuse to test any samples of the initial contamination. Those are Dow's specific instructions in a well decontamination presentation that Dow created immediately after being caught and fined $732,000 for the discovery of the first 249 unreported health complaints previously discussed. Was this a new procedure put in place by Dow to hide water contaminations? This requirement by Dow would of course result in the destruction of the analysis of the real level of the contamination unless additional samples were taken and sent elsewhere for analysis. The results of testing "treated" water, which had already undergone decontamination procedures would unquestionably show much lower levels of chlorpyrifos than when the water was originally contaminated. The treated sample could even be expected to result in non-detectable levels for chlorpyrifos. Was Dow's goal in using this procedural requirement to eliminate the reporting of the contamination to the EPA or was it to destroy the evidence of the existence of the contamination, or both? What would even motivate Dow to provide lab analysis of water samples at no charge? It may seem this was a responsible product stewardship step and out of the kindness of their hearts they provided this service. However, taking on the lab analysis responsibilities would be a critical key-element in a scheme to hide the true number of water contaminations from the EPA and has had many additional benefits for Dow:
Hiding the water contaminations was only the beginning of Dow's fraud. Dow's well decontamination procedure is a scam in two ways:
The Illinois State Health Agency has petitioned the EPA to stop Dow from using the chlorination procedure entirely after they learned of the chlorpyrifos oxon conversion problem. The EPA still has not taken any action on their request. The EPA's lack of action is most likely due to the EPA's misconception that the problem was less significant because Dow misled them by only reporting a small number of the actual chlorpyrifos water contaminations. The EPA needs to act. Even if they were incorrect in their understanding of the number of wells contaminated, the toxicity of chlorpyrifos oxon is a serious threat to entire families drinking and bathing in the polluted water. Those that drank and used water containing chlorpyrifos oxon certainly would deserve to be informed of what has occurred. The continued use of the Dow chlorination procedure is only benefiting Dow Chemical and amounts to allowing Dow to intentionally poison those who drink and use the water. Dow has a history of this type disregard for the laws, human safety, and contempt of the EPA. The EPA can't expect any better compliance from the likes of Dow if it doesn't enforce the laws we rely on it to uphold. If you have had a water contamination you might also want to know that although Dow may have presented their decontamination procedures to you as "EPA Approved" it has been learned that the EPA has not approved of Dow's procedures nor had they any idea what Dow was doing to decontaminate your water. Dow has misrepresented their decontamination procedure as EPA approved. There are several critical steps the EPA needs to make besides stopping the use of the chlorination procedure. They need to:
The most important action is of course to inform those who trusted Dow to do the right thing but instead became victims of Dow - the babies, infants, kids, parents and older adults who trusted that Dow was being honest with their water decontamination and water analysis. We have had reports of chlorpyrifos well contaminations at places like daycare centers and churches, but predominantly at homes where the occupants would have bathed, consumed, and cooked in or with the chlorpyrifos and/or chlorpyrifos oxon polluted water. How about mixing some chlorpyrifos oxon water with your baby formula? Who you are does not matter to Dow. We believe it is even more important for the EPA to determine who was responsible for making these decisions to conduct business in this irresponsible and criminal manner, and to pursue those individuals. Should you wish to share your experience, have a question, or want to be notified of new information, please go here. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links Of Interest USDA - "chlorine in chlorinated tap water will rapidly transform chlorpyrifos to chlorpyrifos oxon" Wu J, Laird DA. Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 "transformation of chlorpyrifos to chlorpyrifos oxon is believed to be a prerequisite for this insecticide to display acute toxicity to organisms. We discovered that active chlorine dispersed in water causes the rapid abiotic transformation of chlorpyrifos to chlorpyrifos oxon" EPA Addendum to the Drinking Water Memorandum to HED "... the State of Illinois and Region 5 of the U.S. EPA have expressed concern over the substantial formation of chlorpyrifos oxon in wells treated for chlorpyrifos contamination. Because the oxon may also exert substantial toxicity, wells treated for chlorpyrifos contamination should also be monitored for the oxon as well as chlorpyrifos. In addition, a level of concern (LOC) for the oxon in drinking water should be developed" Dow Chemical: Risks for Investors http://proxyinformation.com/pdf/DowReport.pdf |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *Dursban, Lorsban, Equity, Empire, Reldan, Pageant, and Tenure are registered trademarks of Dow AgroSciences | |||||||||||||||||||||||||